
April 2003
Volume 4 Issue 3
Table of Contents (click on Title)
2003 Viticulture
Field Day and Steak Cookout |
Note
to Michigan Grape Society Member
Wine
Grape Grower's Luncheon & Tours
Weed Control Zone
Consumer Wine Survey
Grape Scouting Guide from
MSUE
Winter Injury in Grapes in 2003
Grape
Berry Moth Management-Selecting An Insecticide
![]()
The Michigan Grape Society membership has declined somewhat from last year so previous members who have not paid their 2003 dues will not be receiving the information about Viticulture Field Day. If you know someone who would like to attend Viticulture Field Day, please pass the information on to them. We look forward to seeing all our grape growing neighbors at our 14th Annual Viticulture Field Day.
Wine
Grape Grower's Luncheon & Tours--Two Down and Two to Go
By: Al Gaus, Berrien County MSU Extension Agent and Tom Zabadal, Extension
Viticulturist
We have had two of our wine grape grower luncheon and tour events for 2003. The first at Tabor Hill Winery was very successful. Representatives from most of Southwest Michigans wineries were present. Tabor Hill Winery hosted us on May 29 with over 30 in attendance. Lemon Creek Winery hosted us on June 19 with just over 25 in attendance.
At Tabor Hill, a wonderful lunch with wine tasting was followed by a tour of the vineyards and winery. That was followed by field visits to vineyards of Bryan Staffin, David Leslie, and Rick Moersch. At Lemon Creek Winery, a second wonderful lunch was followed by a great discussion period on bloom dates, temperature recording, and insect and disease management. The discussion was then followed by a sunny afternoon tour through some of Lemon Creek Winerys extensive vineyards.
For those of you unaware of these events, we generally meet for an informal lunch. This lunch would then be followed by an afternoon tour to a site such as a vineyard and/or winery. The two remaining dates are July 24 and August 21, 2003. The July 24th meeting will be at Joe Hermans Karma Vista Winery in Coloma where we further discuss crop estimation and adjustment. The August 21st meeting will be at the Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center and will discuss grape vine identification.
These meetings are designed for all those involved with the wine grape industry in Southwest Michigan. This includes growers, winemakers, suppliers, and agribusinesses. Michigan State University Extension prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status. Persons with disabilities may request accommodations by calling the Berrine MSU Extension office at 269-944-4126 two weeks prior to the event.
Details on each meeting will be sent out a couple of weeks before a particular meeting. If you would like to be put on the mailing list for these luncheons and tours, please contact Al Gaus at the Berrien County MSU Extension Office, 269-944-4126 or gausa@msue.msu.edu and ask to be added to the wine grape luncheon list.
Tabor Hill Winery |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Postemergent Herbicides Labeled for Grapes
Every once in a while it is a good thing to check out the herbicides that are labeled for grapes. In the last issue, I wrote about preemergent herbicides. In this issue I will cover postemergent herbicides. Remember, even though I present information here, you need to read the label on the product you purchase to make sure you know when, where, and how to apply it legally.
As a quick review, remember that preemergent herbicides are designed to be applied before the weed seedling emerges. Postemergent herbicides are applied after the weed is present.
Since the Michigan Fruit Management Guide (E-154) page 126 lists herbicides alphabetically by the common name of the chemical, I will list the herbicides in alphabetical order based on the brand name of the herbicide.
Fusilade (fluazifop-P) should only be applied to nonbearing vineyards. It is a systemic herbicide that controls annual and perennial grasses but not broadleaf weeds or sedges. Ideally the grass should be 4 to 8 inches tall.
Gramoxone (paraquat) kills emerged annual weeds by contact. Its response is very rapid. It has no ability to prevent new regrowth from the soil. Two to three applications per season will be needed to maintain control.
Poast (sethoxydim) is a systemic herbicide that controls annual and perennial grasses but not broadleaf weeds or sedges. Ideally grass should be 4 to 8 inches tall. It has a 50-day preharvest interval.
Rely (glufosinate) very similar to paraquat in that it is a non-selective contact herbicide. It provides no residual control. It has a 14-day preharvest interval.
Roundup Ultra 4L or Touchdown (glyphosate) is a nonselective translocated herbicide. In addition to controlling the top portion of the plant, it will kill the roots as well. It provides best results in weeds that have started to export carbohydrates to the roots. It has a 14-day preharvest interval.
Select (clethodin) non-bearing grapes that will not be harvested for at least one year from application. It provides control of annual and perennial grasses but not sedges or broadleaf weeds.
That wraps up a review of the labeled postemergent herbicides for grapes. For more information on herbicides in grapes including recommended rates, please consult the Michigan Fruit Management Guide (E-154). It is available at your local MSU Extension office or online http://www.msue.msu.edu/epubs/pestpubs/E154/index.htm with each section in pdf format.
For best weed control, you should always practice integrated weed management. That means, in part, knowing the species of weed you are trying to control; knowing the proper timing for best control of that weed; considering usage of herbicides combinations either at the same application time or in separate applications; and not applying herbicides to stressed weeds.
Next column: Weed Management.
There is a very exciting consumer survey being conducted by the wine industry "think-tank" called Wine Vision. Wine Vision is working on mapping out strategies for the growth of the U.S. Wine Industry for the future and one of their initiatives is to gather more information on consumer wine buying behavior. It should be very interesting and valuable to the industry to have the results of this work, to aid marketing activity.
It takes about 20 minutes to complete the survey on-line . Whether you are a frequent wine drinker or a non wine drinker, all responses are valuable to the process, so I encourage you to take a few minutes to complete the survey and forward it to other friends and associates who might be willing to participate. The website is http
://v2.decipherinc.com/survey/jhp/wvs. Thank you. ![]()
Grape Scouting Guide from MSU
Extension
By: Rufus Isaacs, MSU Department of Entomology
MSU Extension specialists have teamed up with Tim Weigle from the Lake Erie Grape IPM program to produce a handy vineyard scouting guide for grape growers in the north-central and Great Lakes region of the US. At over 100 pages, but small enough to fit in a pocket, this handy guide has been developed to help grape growers identify problems in their own vineyards. Dr. Tom Zabadal wrote the sections on nutritional disorder symptoms and herbicide damage, Dr. Annemiek Schilder wrote the section on grape diseases, and Dr. Rufus Isaacs wrote the sections on insect pests and natural enemies. The guide contains hundreds of photographs and descriptions, and has a scouting calendar for pests and diseases. Members of National Grape Cooperative will each receive a copy, and other copies will be available after July 7th through the MSU Extension Bulletin Office (517-355-0240). The full title is "A Pocket Guide for Grape IPM Scouting in the North Central and Eastern US", by Isaacs, Schilder, Zabadal, and Weigle. The guide is Bulletin New number E-2889.
Winter Injury in Grapes in 2003?
By: Mark Longstroth, MSUE Horticultural & Marketing Agent
Like most people in Agriculture, I pay close attention to the weather. I pay particular attention to winter temperatures because I know that in Michigan, there is always the chance of winter injury. This year we are seeing lots of cold injury and it seems that we are seeing the result several distinct events. Several Horticulturists in Michigan have identified several events they think are responsible for the winter injury we are seeing all around Michigan this year.
In Southern and Central Michigan there was an extreme cold snap in early December (0 to -15 F) as the plants were beginning to acclimate to winter conditions. Bob Tritten, in Southeast Michigan, is seeing extensive winter injury that resulted from very cold temperatures following a fall when plants were slow to lose leaves and acclimate to the cold. We are seeing the same symptoms in Southwestern and Central Michigan. This is the freeze that killed young trees in the southern part of the state. We are also seeing cold injury to the trunks of grapevines in Southern Michigan in low spots close to the ground. The further away from the lake the more severe the injury and the injured plants are always in low spots with poor air drainage.
In March, it was Northern Michigan's turn. Jim
Nugent, the District Horticultural Agent for Northern Michigan, has identified the event.
It occurred on March 3rd, when temperatures dropped to -10° to -20°F. following highs in
the upper 30's on February 28th and March 1st. This event severely damaged wine grapes in
Northern Michigan. Dr Tom Zabadal, Extension Grape Specialist, says that it is the worst
winter injury to grapes that he has seen in his career. Besides wiping ou
t the wine grape crop this freeze reduced the sweet and tart
cherry crops. Jim and Tom also report severe trunk injury in both cherries and grapes.
When plants become cold acclimated in the Fall the cold hardiness begins at the shoot tips
and progresses down the tree to the trunk and finally to the ground. Injury to the base of
a tree often indicates that the injury took place early in the season, as the plant was
hardening off for winter. Since Jim reports that the trees were injured to the snow line
this indicates that the damage in Northern Michigan was late in the season and not the
early December cold snap.
Winter injury in Michigan is a common occurrence. Although growers may think that winter injury is caused by extreme cold, most winter injury is caused by cold snaps early or late in the dormant season or mid winter thaws followed quickly by cold temperatures. In these cases, the cause is the rapid change in temperature over a short time period before the plant can acclimate to the cold. The winter of 2002-2003 offers many examples of this type of injury.
![]()
Grape
Berry Moth ManagementSelecting An Insecticide
By: Rufus Isaacs, MSU Department of Entomology
As a follow-up to the article in last issue, insecticides available for use in grapes will be compared, with an emphasis on their properties in relation to control of grape berry moth (GBM).
Berry Moth Update
Pheromone monitoring traps placed in vineyards across SW Michigan have been trapping grape berry moth at typical levels during their first flight in the pre-bloom period. This pest that caused such problems last year has survived the cold winter well, and an effective scouting and control program will be required for the 2003 season. Around the time that bloom started in the juice grape vineyards this year, we started to find the first eggs and the first young larvae of this pest (first detected June 12 and 13 in Van Buren and Berrien counties). This first generation of larvae can be controlled with a well-timed insecticide applied after bloom, to target the exposed larvae and eggs in the young clusters.
If GBM pest pressure remains high in the next generation, additional treatments may be required in late July-early August. The need for these later season sprays can be determined by scouting on the clusters for eggs and larvae through mid July to mid-August. Vineyards where GBM are found at this time may also require regular scouting late in the season to ensure that pre-harvest infestation by GBM is minimal, avoiding the risk of load rejection.
| Insecticide | Chemical |
GBM |
Length of activity |
Potential to Harm natural enemies |
Beetletoxicity |
Leafhopper |
Notes |
Sevin |
Carbamate |
*** | ** | **** | **** | *** | Some GLH populations are resistant to carbamates |
Lannate |
Carbamate |
** | * | ** | ** | ** | Short residual activity |
Guthion |
Organophos |
*** | *** | ** | *** | ** | |
Imidan |
Organophos |
*** | ** | ** | **** | ** | Buffer spray water to correct pH |
Danitol |
Pyrethroid |
**** | *** | **** | **** | **** | One app. after bloom, to protect natural enemies |
Intrepid |
Growth Reg. |
**** | **** | - | - | - | Excellent cluster coverage is essential to get control |
SpinTor |
Naturalyte |
** | ** | * | * | *** | Susceptible to wash-off by rainfall. |
| B.t. (Dipel etc.) |
Biological |
** | * | - | - | - | Short residual. Organic. |
| Neem (Ecozin etc.) |
Biological |
** | * | * | ** | ** | Short residual. Organic. |
Provado |
Neonicotinoid |
- | *** | * | * | **** | Limit of 1 oz. per year |
Assail |
Neonicotinoid |
- | *** | * | * | **** |
