mgs.jpg (54108 bytes)

 

 

April 2003
Volume 4 Issue 2


Table of Contents (click on Title)

2003 Southwest Michigan Horticultural Days--Great Success
2003 Trevor Nichols Pruning Day
Having A Problem With Niagara Winter Injury? Try the Unconventional
Wine grape Grower's Luncheon & Tours
Weed Control Zone
Prospects for the 2003 Michigan Grape Crop
Grape IPM Meetings in 2003
Preparing for Insect Pests in 2003
Focus On Phomopsis
Useful MSU Weather Links On The Web
Michigan's Wine Industry Evolves
Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Updates
Vitcultural Field Day
Michigan Grape Society Dues Form

bordergrape.jpg (46359 bytes)

2003 Southwest Michigan Horticultural Days--Great Success03hdwin2.jpg (27460 bytes)

The two-day event held February 5th and 6th at Lake Michigan College’s Mendal Center was attended by over 400 participants. The exhibition room was filled to capacity with new and returning exhibitors. The featured out-of-state speakers and the quality of programs has continued to please all in attendance.

The Wine Hospitality Reception was attended by over 70 people who all enjoyed tasting wine from numerous wineries in the area.

The Michigan Grape Society would like to thank all the exhibitors, participants and the wineries who donated the wine for the hospitality reception and for making Southwest Hort Days successful. Your contributions to the program are appreciated.

bordergrape.jpg (46359 bytes)

2003 Trevor Nichols Pruning Day
By: Rufus Isaacs, MSU Entomology

The MSU Entomology farm (Trevor Nichols Research Complex) in Fennville was the venue for gathering of an unusual pruning crew on March 13th. Staff from the research station were joined by grape growers, representatives from National Grape, campus researchers, and graduate students to finish our pruning jobs in the research vineyards. With the help of this enthusiastic crew, vines were pruned and tied by lunchtime, and we could head back to the research station early for pizza.

This annual pruning event provides the Viticultural Entomology Program a chance to get a 'check-up' from the Michigan grapepruningcrew03.jpg (61562 bytes) industry on the health of our vineyards, and our progress toward making the vineyards more representative of commercial production. We also get our pruning finished for the winter!

Our Niagara vineyard is establishing well, and will be in its fourth leaf this year. The older Concord vineyard is still in transition from a kniffin system to the top-wire cordon system. This year we'll be bringing up last-year's suckers onto the new trellis to establish new trunks and cordons. Half of the vines will remain in the old system as we undergo this transition, to provide enough fruit and foliage for conducting our insecticide trials. Hopefully in the next few years, we'll be back to a full canopy on the new trellis with the new training system.

Finally, a big 'thank you' to all who helped make this pruning outing so successful. See you next year.

 

Having A Problems With Niagara Winter Injury? Try the Unconventional.
By: Terry Holloway, Viticulture Specialist, National Grape Co-op
vines402.jpg (29084 bytes)

Many of the new Niagara vineyards established in Michigan in recent years have been planted on rolling terrain, resulting in significant variations in the vine vigor and susceptibility to winter injury. Traditional trellising efforts have often failed to establish the large trunks necessary to withstand below zero temperatures. When considering what to do with the vineyards on these sites, you need to review what hasn’t worked and perhaps consider the unconventional.

Consider Multiple Trunks—These sites tend to have both high fertility and water holding capacity, which promote overly vigorous canes that are susceptible to winter injury. Since they have often been lightly cropped, the root systems of these plants tend to be well established. These inherent conditions lend themselves to a differentvines2402.jpg (37392 bytes) trellising system. Multiple trucks (4-8) are a strategy that can help reduce vigor and increase chances for surviving cold temperatures. Trunks will die over time, but suckers can be consistently renewed and old trunks can be removed. A bottom wire is essential to training new trunks and making it easier to wrap long canes. Many of the new shoots brought up each year will be too short to reach the top wire and can be easily tied to the bottom wire. The use of grow tubes is helpful as an aid in both trellising and weed control. Several strings tied in a V-shaped configuration can also help to manage multiple trunks. It’s important to keep the growth off the ground so that canes are exposed to adequate sunlight and to help in weed control. These vines will look unconventional, but remember anything goes when trellising these areas.

Start with Minimal PruningWhen pruning these vines, growers have observed that minimal pruning works best until you develop sizable trunks below the bottom wire. Spreading a vine’s vigor over a larger number of retained nodes will reduce the growth rate of all shoots, encourage hardening off (maturation) of the canes in the fall, and improve the winter hardiness of the vine overall. When selecting fruiting wood, retain laterals on bull canes with 1– or 2-bud spurs, for these are the most fruitful buds

 

Wine Grape Grower’s Luncheon & Tours
By: Al Gaus, Berrien County MSU Extension Agent and Tom Zabadal, Extension Viticulturist

Because of the four successful events in 2002, we have decided to have four more in 2003. The dates are May 29th, June 19th, July 24th, and August 21st.

For those of you unaware of these events, we generally meet for an informal lunch. This lunch would then be followed by an afternoon tour to a site such as a vineyard and/or winery.

These meetings that are open to all are designed for all those involved with the wine grape industry in Southwest Michigan. This includes growers, winemakers, suppliers, and agri-businesses.

Details on each meeting will be sent out a couple of weeks before a particular meeting. If you would like to be put on the mailing list for these luncheons and tours, please contact Al Gaus at the Berrien County MSU Extension Office (269) 944-4126 or gausa@msue.msu.edu and ask to be added to the wine grape luncheon list.

 

Weed Control Zone [a series of articles in the next several issues]
By: Al Gaus, Berrien County MSU Extension Commercial Horticulture Agent

Preemergent Herbicides Labeled For Grapes
Every once in a while it is a good thing to check out the herbicides that are labeled for grapes. Now, even though I present information here, you need to read the label on the product you purchase to make sure you know when, where, and how to apply it legally.

In this newsletter, I will discuss preemergent herbicides. In the next issue of this newsletter, I will cover the postemergent herbicides. As a quick review, remember that preemergent herbicides are designed to be applied before the weed seedling emerges. Postemergent herbicides are applied after the weed is present.

Since the Michigan Fruit Management Guide (E-154) page 126 lists herbicides alphabetically by the common name of the chemical, I will list the herbicides in alphabetical order based on the brand name of the herbicide.

Casoron (dichlobenil) should be applied to grapes established one year or more. It is best applied in November just prior to a snowfall. It is effective against quackgrass and will suppress most annual and perennial weeds until late summer of the following year.

Devrinol (napropamide) can be applied the year of planting. It should be applied early in the spring to weed-free soil. It needs to be incorporated since it is inactivated by light. It does not have a long residual period of control. It controls annual grasses and some broadleaves. Performance in Michigan has been poor.

Goal (oxyfluorfen) should only be applied to grapes established three or more years. It should be applied while the plant is dormant. Also has some postemergent activity.

Karmex (diuron) is particularly effective on grasses and broadleaf weeds. It should only be used on vines that have been established for at least 3 years. It should be applied in the spring before weed growth begins. Use lower rate on sandy soils.

Kerb (pronamide) should only be applied to grapes established one ore more. It is effective at killing quackgrass rhizomes and germinating annual weeds. It is most effective on grasses and a few broad-leafed weeds. It should be applied in the fall after fruit harvest but prior to leaf drop.

Princep (simazine) is effective against germinating annual weeds when applied in the spring before weed growth begins. It should only be applied to vines that have been established for at least 3 years. Use lower rates on sandy soils.

Prowl (pendimethalin) should be applied to nonbearing grapes only. It controls annual grasses and should be applied after the soil settles but before bud swell. Needs rainfall within seven days for best control.

Solicam (norflurazon) should be applied to grapes established two or more years. It can be applied in either the fall or the spring, but fall applications are more effective. It will suppress annual grasses and nutsedge. Use lower rates on sandy soils.

Surflan (oryzalin) can be applied to newly planted grapes. Apply to plantings in the spring before weeds emerge. This herbicide must also be watered in for maximum control. Surflan suppresses annual grasses and some broad-leafed weeds. Apply lower rates on sandy soils.

That wraps up a review of the labeled preemergent herbicides for grapes. For more information on herbicides in grapes including recommended rates, please consult the Michigan Fruit Management Guide (E-154). It is available at your local MSU Extension office or online http://www.msue.msu.edu/epubs/pestpubs/E154/index.htm with each section in pdf format.

For best weed control, you should always practice integrated weed management. That means, in part, knowing the species of weed you are trying to control; knowing the proper timing for best control of that weed; considering usage of herbicides combinations either at the same application time or in separate applications; and not applying herbicides to stressed weeds.

Next article: Post Emergent Herbicides.

 

Prospects for the 2003 Michigan Grape Crop
By: Tom Zabadal, SWMREC Coordinator

As I write these words on a snowy, wintry day in April, it seems as though the 2003 growing season is off in the distance. However, the reality is that in just a couple of weeks we will be experiencing bud swell and bud break in southern Michigan and another season will be upon us. After two years of greatly reduced juice grape crops in the southern part of the state, growers are understandably anxious about this year's crop. For the most part prospects look very good at this time for the juice grape crop. A fairly mild winter combined with reduced pruning severity by many growers, along with the expectation of greater than average bud fruitfulness all suggest that there is ample fruiting potential on the vines at this time. Nevertheless, this was also the case in the April of the two previous years so I'm sure we won't be confident in the size of this year's juice grape crop until we see the berries hanging on the vine after fruit set.

The wine grape crop in the southern part of the state also looks to be in good shape. In our plot work we recorded winter low temperatures of about -2 oF at a couple of Berrien County locations. I have found some bud mortality on wine grape varieties but the prospects still look good for a crop this year. Therefore, if we can get through the worrisome period of spring freezes, we can expect a good wine grape crop in southwest Michigan.

Unfortunately, crop prospects for wine grapes in the Traverse City area do not look good at all. An episode on the evening of March 2nd resulted in winter-low temperatures of -10 to -20 oF temperatures. Just 48 hours earlier, some temperatures in that area were approaching 40 oF. Therefore, these very low winter temperatures were accompanied by a precipitous drop in temperature. It appears that the results were devastating to many vineyards in the area. Our assessment of injury to White Riesling grapevines in our research plot at the Northwest Research Station indicates greater than 90% bud mortality to not only the primary but also the secondary buds on these vines. A sampling of buds from other vineyards around the Traverse City area suggests that the mortality to fruiting buds has been widespread. On a positive note, there was a significant snow cover at most locations at the time of this episode so that all buds covered by the snow pack are in good shape. In the weeks ahead it will become apparent how much fruiting potential of the vines was maintained under the snow cover. The snow cover also means that there should be no problems with vine survival or the long term productivity of vineyards. Nevertheless, the prospect is for a greatly reduced crop from this portion of our Michigan grape industry in 2003.

Grape IPM Meetings in 2003

There will be several Grape IPM Meetings in Southwest Michigan this year. Because we anticipate real problems with grape insects and diseases, we will have meetings for the early season, bloom and late season pest control. These meeting will be held in both Berrien and Van Buren counties on the same day. These meeting are scheduled for April 30, June 4 and July 23.

On April 30th, the first meeting will be in Lawton at Bryan Cronenwett’s, 69260 28th, at 10 AM and the second at SWMREC at 1:30 PM. The focus of this first meeting will be early season insect and disease control in grapes.

On June 4 the meetings will focus on bloom sprays for disease and insect control. The final meeting on July 23 will focus on late season disease control. We will update you on the sites and times before the meetings. For more information check the Fruit Hotlines at Van Buren (269) 657-6380 and Berrien (269) 944-4126 ext. 1 counties.

Preparing For Insect Pests In 2003
By: Rufus Isaacs, MSU Entomology

As we prepare for this growing season, insects are on the minds of many grape growers because of pest problems in 2002. Grape berry moth was a major pest management challenge last year in Southwest Michigan, and a repeat of that experience would be most unwelcomed. This article will outline issues of scouting, spray coverage, and new insecticides, as they relate to minimizing insect pest damage in the year ahead.

Scouting
The most important way to keep ahead of insect pests is to conduct weekly scouting of the foliage and fruit in vineyards. By doing this, any developing problems can be detected and decisions can be made on whether there is a need to respond or not. This can be time-consuming, but it may allow sprays to be saved and can also prevent pests getting out of control.

To focus scouting efforts, vineyards with a history of pest problems should be scouted first. Hotspots for grape berry moth such as rows near wooded borders should be included in the regular scouting plan. There are also critical times in pest development cycles when it makes sense to invest in scouting efforts (e.g. at bud swell for cutworms and steely beetle). As the season progresses, scouting should include looking deep under the canopy to make sure those areas with good conditions for insects (and diseases) are checked.

Knowing what to look for is important when scouting, and there are many guides online (just type "grape insect pest" into a web search engine). To help Michigan grape growers identify pests, diseases, nutritional deficiencies and herbicide injury in their vineyards, a pocket scouting guide for grapes will be published by MSU Extension this year. Another good way to keep up to date will be to attend the three pest management training sessions MSU Extension and National Grape Coop. are planning for early, middle, and late season.

Spray Coverage
This seems like an issue that keeps coming up. There are many opinions on what rate of water is required per acre to get 'good coverage', and this will vary with sprayer type, etc. However, it is clear that excellent coverage of the fruit cluster with insecticide residues is necessary when targeting the egg or larva of grape berry moth. Excellent coverage probably requires driving every row and increasing spray gallonage as the season progresses. With support from Project GREEEN and National Grape Cooperative, we will be studying this issue with the MSU Agricultural Engineers in the next few years to get a better understanding of how to achieve excellent coverage and excellent control.

For broad-spectrum insecticides such as Sevin or Danitol, cluster coverage is necessary to ensure contact with the egg or young larvae. This issue will be even more important for some of the new insecticides (see below) which are not contact poisons. These insecticides may require the larva to eat a small amount of reside before it will die. If this is the case, the residue has to be in the tiny spot where the larva enters the berry. Unless the cluster is well-covered, the larva could enter the berry without eating the insecticide and then survive to grow and develop.

Insecticide Update
As part of the EPA's response to the Food Quality Protection Act, Guthion has been restricted in many crops, including grapes. This insecticide will no longer be manufactured with grape on the label. Existing stocks can be used up.

A few new insecticides and miticides have recently been registered for use in grapes. Their properties and pest spectrum are described below. Some of these compounds work differently than conventional insecticides, and a good understanding of their properties will help improve their effective use.

Assail is labeled for leafhoppers and is expected to have good activity against both grape and potato leafhoppers. Some protection of treated vines from damage by other insect types has been seen in recent trials, including Japanese beetles. Assail is a neonicotinoid insecticide (in the same class as Provado), from Cerexagri. It will not control grape berry moth.

Intrepid causes a lethal premature molt in moth larvae that eat the insecticide. It is labeled for grape berry moth and redbanded leafroller. Because the larvae must ingest this product for effective control, Intrepid requires excellent coverage of clusters for control of grape berry moth. This product is an insect growth regulator from Dow AgroSciences that is specific to moth larvae. It will not control leafhoppers or beetles. Intrepid has a 30 day pre-harvest interval in grapes.

SpinTor has direct contact activity, and is also active if ingested. Targets include grape berry moth and redbanded leafroller. SpinTor is in a new insecticide class called the naturalytes, from Dow AgroSciences. It has a 7 day pre-harvest interval in grapes.

Acramite should provide rapid knockdown of mites (two-spotted and European red mite), with a long residual activity. It is active on motile stages, with some egg activity. This miticide is a carbazate miticide from Uniroyal Chemical.

 

Focus On Phomopsis
By: Mark Longstroth, District Extension Horticultural and Marketing Agent

Over the last several years, Phomopsis has become more and more of a problem for Michigan grape growers. Since many growers tried to save money last year by saving sprays I think we will see a lot of phomopsis again this year. I think growers will need to spray a little more this year to control the disease. Growers will need to use some of the sprays they saved last year to protect their crop. I think the cost of the extra sprays will be cheaper than leaving part of the crop on the ground in the vineyard.

Early season control of Phomopsis is crucial. The phomopsis spores that will cause this year's infections will come off last year's wood. Leaf and shoot symptoms that you see this spring give you an indication of how effective your disease control program is and how bad your phomopsis problem will be next year. Your focus should be on preventing phomopsis from becoming established in the vineyard again this year, and in preventing last year's infections from spreading to this year's fruit.

Phomopsis attacks young actively growing tissue, but symptoms do not become apparent until at least 3 or 4 weeks later. The flower cluster and young fruit are very susceptible to Phomopsis at all times. This means that growers need to protect their flower clusters as soon as they become visible as the budgrape_shoot.JPG (47840 bytes) opens through bloom. Spore capture studies in Michigan indicate that most of the Phomopsis spores are released before and during bloom. We think that fruit infections early in the growing season that do not become apparent until harvest approaches. Mid and late season eradication is impossible because the diseases is already established in the fruit and substantial losses to fruit rots or fruit drop will occur.

EBDC (ethylene-bisdithiocarbamate) materials, such as Dithane and Penncozeb, provide excellent protection against phomopsis. Growers need to maintain good EBDC coverage with 3 or more sprays before bloom. Maintaining good fungicide coverage of the shoot and especially the young flower clusters requires that fungicides be applied as new tissue emerges and also when rain washes off material that has already been applied. A rainy spring will mean lots of phomopsis this fall. I assume that every time it rains an inch that most of the fungicide has been washed off and you need to apply another spray to maintain your protection.

The bloom sprays are important sprays for controlling all the diseases that attack the fruit. The EBDC spray applied immediately before bloom should be tank mixed with a SI fungicide such as Indar of Nova to give good control against all grape diseases. For this last pre-bloom spray you could also usegphmop17.JPG (72938 bytes) a strobilurin fungicide, Abound or Sovran alone. The strobilurin fungicides give good broad-spectrum control. These materials provide control against all the major grape diseases except Botrytis. The strobilurin fungicides, Abound and Sovran should be used in rotation with the other fungicides and sprayed no more than two times in a row. The strobilurin fungicides are rated as excellent against phomopsis and they are systemic and absorbed by the plant. Abound or Sovran should be the materials of choice for Concord and Niagara vineyards. Abound is slightly better than Sovran for downy mildew control. Either a strobilurin fungicide alone or a tank mix of Ziram and a SI is recommended in the post bloom period and provide about 14 days of control.

Be ready to spray early. Plan on covering the exposed flower buds as soon as they are exposed and try to maintain good fungicide coverage. If rain is forecasted get your sprays on before the rain.

 

Useful MSU Weather links on the Web
By: Mark Longstroth District Extension Horticultural Agent

I had several growers ask about weather links I use. I use commercial weather links like Accuweather.com and Weather.com, but I also use MSU Agricultural Weather Office at http://www.agweather.geo.msu.edu/ a lot. The MSU site has the current weather and forecasts for the different regions of Michigan. I can also get the projected Minimum temperatures for the next morning, which are usually posted at noon. I also access the MSU Automated Weather Network or MAWN at http://www.agweather.geo.msu.edu/mawn/. This site allows me to get the current weather from automated weather stations in my growing region and elsewhere in Michigan. The site I like the best from a Fruit IPM point of view in the MSU ICM or Scud site at http://scud.geo.msu.edu/ipm/. (Scud is a type of cloud.) This site allows me to run several predictive models for fruit pests and diseases using the weather data collected from the automated weather system. This means that growers can use real weather data from automated weather systems close to their plantings to predict things like apple scab, fireblight, codling moth, oriental fruit moth, cherry leaf spot and black rot of grapes. When you access the Scud site you should create a User ID and password for yourself. This will allow you to enter data for the various models such as green tip and the data will be remembered from session to session so you do not need to re-enter that data each time.

 

Michigan's Wine Industry Evolves
Linda Jones, Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council

Michigan's wine industry has undergone significant transfor-mation over the past 25 years, with changes in the varieties of grapes grown and used for wine, the styles of wine produced, the quality of wine available, and the facilities open to the public. grapeacreage.jpg (24503 bytes)

Changes in Michigan's Fruit Industry— Global competition in other commodity fruit crops has elevated the potential for wine grapes as a significant contributor to the fruit industry in Michigan. Value-added or entrepreneurial agriculture is identified as a means of preserving rural spaces valued by Michigan residents. The wine industry offers the agribusiness owner the opportunity to maintain a farming business with a satisfactory return on investment. The strength of Michigan's wine producing regions as tourist destinations further supports the potential for growth in the industry.

Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council—The Michigan Wine Institute and its successor organization, the legislatively created Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council have played important roles in supporting the industry. Administered by the Michigan Department of Agriculture, the Council directs promotional programs andwinegrowth.jpg (25715 bytes) funding of research to assist the wine grape industry.

Continued Growth Potential-While growth of the industry in the past 25 years has been satisfactory, the pace of growth has fallen short of some emerging wine producing regions in the Great Lakes region. Obstacles to a more accelerated growth have been identified by the industry. As these issues are addressed, the contribution of the wine industry to Michigan's economy can rise dramatically in the years ahead.

 

Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Updates

Strategic Planning

The Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council is gathering ideas from the industry and associates on the future direction of the Council. If you have ideas you wish to share with the Council, please forward them to Kathy Kissman, Marketing and Communication Division Director, Michigan Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 30017, Lansing, MI 48909. If you would like some questions to guide your response, a survey is posted on the Industry Resources section of the michiganwines.com web site or can be FAXed to you by calling 517 241-4468.

Michigan Wine Industry Annual Meeting
Current and aspiring members of the Michigan's burgeoning wine industry gathered at Crystal Mountain Resort in late February for two days of intensive professional development. One hundred and twenty registrants attended sessions dealing with wine quality, sales and marketing and vineyard management. Seven wineries were presented awards for being in the industry twenty-five years or more.

Prominent guest speakers included David Sloane, President of Wine America, and Len Penachetti, President of the Ontario Vintner's Quality Alliance. The Michigan Legislature was represented by Senator Michelle McManus and Representative Neil Nitz.

The seven most senior wineries in the state are: St. Julian (82 yrs.), Warner (64 yrs.), Boskydel (38 yrs.), Chateau Grand Traverse (32 yrs.), Tabor Hill (30 yrs.), Fenn Valley (29 yrs.) and Leelanau Cellars (28 yrs.).

Attendees were delighted that Bernie Rink of Boskydel Vineyard in Lake Leelanau, the grandfather of northern Michigan's wine industry, made a rare appearance away from his winery. Mr. Rink, who planted the first wine grapes in the area in 1964, regaled attendees with his typically witty remarks.

For continuing updates of event details, visit www.michiganwines.com

 

wpe5.jpg (18457 bytes)Viticultural Field Day, July 30, 2003

Details and Registration should be available July 1st, 2003. Make sure you have paid your Michigan Grape Society Dues so you will receive the newsletter with the registration. Dues are $15 a year. Mail dues payment to Michigan Grape Society C/O MSUE, 801 Hazen St., Suite A, Paw Paw, MI 49079. There is a dues form enclosed in this newsletter.

 

 

 

Advertising in the Michigan Grape Society Newsletter
By: Tim Seppala, Michigan Grape Society Board Member

Do you have an implement, tractor, or tool you would like to sell?  Do you have a service you would be interested in offering?  Why don't you buy an advertisement in the Michigan Grape Society newsletter.  Our circulation is about 270 and is focused at grape growers who would be interested in what you have to sell.  If you have an item you would like to sell call Jerri at 269-657-7745 or email her at pursleyj@msue.msu.edu.

Our rates are very competitive.

1/8th of a page advertisement- $100.00
One quarter page - $175.00
Half a page - $ 300.00
Full page - $500.00

Not only would you be helping yourself, but you will be helping the Michigan Grape Society.  So, don't hesitate.  Grab a page.

 

danitolgrape.jpg (43544 bytes)

Back to Michgan Grape Society Home Page j0079108.jpg (23224 bytes)