Agriculture

wpe6.jpg (26469 bytes)

Volume 2 Issue I   April 2005              An MSU Extension Newsletter serving agriculture in the Tri-County Area
msulogo.gif (30065 bytes)  Bringing Knowledge to Life                     Planting Edition
INSIDE THIS ISSUE-CLICK ON TITLE
Early Planted Soybean Considerations
Early Planted Corn Considerations
Potash Management Strategies
Micronutrient Recommendations
Near Seed Fertilizer Placement
Preventing Anhydrous Ammonia Theft
Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Strategies
Soybean Rust Monitoring
Field Crop Hotline
Tracking Soybean Rust Toward Michigan
Improving Tractor Performance & Fuel Efficiency
Considerations for the Day of Planting
Hybrid Maturity Selection to Maximize Profits in 2005
Dear Agricultural Producer:
Welcome to the first issue of the 2005 “Between the Rows” agricultural newsletter for farmers in Berrien, Cass and Van Buren counties. Our goal in producing the newsletter is to provide you with timely information that will benefit your business. Much of the information contained in this newsletter will help you reduce your input costs this season.

Sincerely, 

mikesignature.gif (4892 bytes)                                  rajzersignature.gif (3236 bytes)
Mike Staton                                                Dan Rajzer
MSUE Agricultural/Natural                           County Extension Director, Cass County
Resource Agent, Van Buren Co.

 

Spray Equipment Recommendations for Controlling
Soybean Rust and Soybean Aphids

Soybean producers should make sure that their sprayers are set up to achieve the maximum level of control of soybean rust and soybean aphids before the need arises. The specific parameters for achieving maximum control of these pests are listed below:

1. Select nozzles or a combination of a nozzle body and two nozzles that produce dual flat fan patterns. One spray pattern should be angled toward the front of the boom and the other should be angled toward the rear. This combination of spray patterns provides the best deposition of droplets into the canopy. If you decide to use two nozzles on an angled body, each nozzle should be sized to apply ½ the output produced by the recommended single nozzle.

2. Apply 15 to 20 gallons of water per acre. Twenty gallons per acre is recommended as it has been shown to improve plant coverage.

3. Set your sprayer to deliver between 50 and 60 pounds of pressure per square inch. Again, the higher end of the range is recommended to improve coverage.

Select the speed at which you plan to operate the sprayer. Speeds greater than 7 mph may reduce leaf coverage.

Select nozzles that will produce medium-sized droplets (200-300 micron VMD) under the parameters listed above. Fine droplets will not reach the lower leaves and larger droplets won’t provide adequate coverage.

Early-Planted Soybean Considerations

The entire month of May has traditionally been the time to plant soybeans in Southwest Michigan with most growers waiting until they have finished planting corn. However, soybean planting has been delayed in the past several growing seasons due to frequent and heavy rains in early May. Many growers have realized that their early-planted soybeans produced higher yields than their later-planted beans in these years and they are interested in planting soybeans earlier than normal. The risks and the benefits of early planting will be summarized in this article. Specific management practices for early-planted soybeans are also provided.

One of the biggest advantages of early planting is that it provides a longer planting window for attaining maximum yields. Data from the University of Wisconsin and The Ohio State University indicate that beans planted on May 1 will yield about seven bushels per acre higher than beans planted during the last week of May. Beans planted during the last week of April have produced slightly higher yields than those planted on May 1. University agronomists have also found that the newer soybean varieties are more tolerant of adverse, early season conditions than older varieties.

The primary risk of early-planting is that the beans will be damaged by freezing temperatures. This risk is mitigated to some degree by the fact that germination is delayed under the cooler soil temperatures. Soybean tissue is also more resistant to freezing temperatures than corn tissue. Typically, temperatures must reach 28 degrees F for damage to occur. There is also risk that soil-borne diseases may damage soybean seed planted into cool soils. Sudden death syndrome and bean leaf beetles are also more likely to attack early-planted beans.

If you decide to plant soybeans in the last week of April, you should consider the following recommendations.

Don’t plant unless the soil is dry enough to support equipment. Shallow soil compaction will haunt you the remainder of the growing season.

Treat the seed with Apron or Allegience fungicides.

Till the field or clear the residue away from the row to allow the soil to warm up faster and reduce the likelihood of frost damage.

Plant in fields at higher elevations with good air drainage to reduce the likelihood of frost injury.

 

Early-Planted Corn Considerations

One way that growers can reduce the likelihood of planting delays is to begin planting earlier. Research conducted by the University of Minnesota shows that corn planted in April produces the highest yields. This remains true even if populations are reduced and the stands germinate unevenly. Corn seed requires about 100 growing degree days to germinate and emerge regardless of the planting date. Corn planted in mid-April may take 25 days to emerge whereas corn planted in late May will emerge in 5 to 7 days.

The benefits of early planting include a longer planting window for obtaining optimum yields, higher overall yields, higher test weights, lower drying costs in the fall, and reduced lodging.

The risks of early planting are that the crop may be damaged by a late spring frost and replanting may be required. The risk is minimized as cool soil temperatures delay germination and emergence. Soil temperatures must reach 28 degrees F to damage the growing points on small seedlings or plants that have not yet emerged.

If you plan to plant corn early, consider these recommendations.

1. Till only when necessary and be patient in no-till fields.

2. Do not plant unless the soil is dry enough to support equipment and allow planting equipment to operate properly.

3. Never plant before April 15th

4. Plant corn seed 1.5 to 2 inches deep. If you plan to plant 1.5 inches deep, make sure your planting speed is 4.5 to 5 mph and your closing wheels are packing the soil over the seed adequately.

5. Increase your seeding rates to achieve 110% of your desired harvest population.

6. Use Bt corn borer hybrids or plan to scout early-planted fields closely and be ready to treat for first generation European corn borer larvae.

7. Consider using Bt rootworm hybrids when planting near April 15th. Rootworm seed treatments and soil applied insecticides may breakdown or leach beyond the roots and not provide adequate protection from rootworm larvae feeding in late May to early June.

 

Potash Management Strategies

Potash prices have increased significantly and supplies may be limited. Growers will need to make careful decisions about how to allocate this expensive and essential nutrient across their acreage. The recommended steps for making this decision are listed below:

1. Test your soils and set realistic yield goals

2. Understand Michigan State University’s potassium recommendation scheme (figure 1). In the build-up range, nutrient recommendations exceed crop removal rates until the critical level is attained. Once the soil test level has reached the critical level, the soil is capable of providing enough potassium to produce 95 to 97% of the soil’s maximum yield potential. In the maintenance range, nutrient recommendations are equal to crop removal rates. The difference between the critical level and the maintenance limit is either 25 or 30 ppm for most crops. In the drawdown range, nutrient recommendations are less than crop removal rates.

wpe8.jpg (9058 bytes)

3. Know the critical soil test levels for K (Table 1)

Table 1. Effect of CEC on Critical Soil Test Levels for Potassium

Cation Exchange Capacity

Critical K Soil Test Level(ppm)

4

85

6

90

8

95

10

100

12

105

4.  Know K2O crop removal rates (Table 2)

Table 2. K2O Removal Rates for Various Crops

Crop K2O Removal Rate
Corn .27 lbs. per bushel
Soybeans 1.4 lbs. per bushel
Wheat .37 lbs. per bushel
Alfalfa 50 lbs. per ton

 5. Be able to predict how your fertilizer allocations will affect crop yields and future soil test K levels. Remember that the critical soil test levels are high enough to attain 95 to 97% of the yield potential for the soil type. Potash fertilizer applications will not produce significantly higher yields at these soil test levels. To determine how soil test K levels will change, you should consider that crops must remove 4 lbs. per acre of K2O in coarse-textured soils and 12 lbs. per acre of K2O in fine-textured soils to reduce the soil test K level by 1 ppm. You must add these same amounts to increase soil test levels by 1 ppm.

How much will my soil test levels change if I decide not to add potash to a coarse-textured soil this year?

  • For 150 bushels of corn/acre
    • 150 bu x .27 lbs./acre = 40.5 lbs of K2O /acre removed by the crop
    • Remember it takes 4 lbs. of K2O to change the soil test by 1 ppm
    • 40.5 ÷ 4 = 10 ppm

Subtract this amount from your existing soil test levels (ppm) to determine how your soil test levels will change.

6.  Determine where your soil test K levels are in relation to the critical levels and estimate how your K soil test levels will be affected by your application decisions. Use this information to decide how to allocate potash fertilizer this season.

7.  Always apply K2O in the starter fertilizer in no till corn and whenever soil test K levels are below the critical level.

 

Micronutrient Recommendations
There are several factors that determine if economic returns from micronutrient fertilizer applications are realized Make sure you understand each of these before purchasing and applying micronutrients.

Is the crop responsive to the micronutrient? Crops vary in their responsiveness to micronutrients. Use the table below to determine which micronutrients your crops will respond to. A crop that is highly responsive will usually respond to the application of that nutrient when soil test levels are low. A crop having a medium response rating may or may not respond to a micronutrient application. Crops rated as having a low response will probably not respond to nutrient additions even when the soil test level is low.

Table 1 or 3– Relative response of selected crops to micronutrient fertilizers

Crop Manganese Boron Copper Zinc
Alfalfa Low High Medium Low
Corn Medium Low Medium High
Soybeans High Low Low Medium
Wheat High Low High Low
Source: MSU Extension Bulletin E-2904 “Nutrient Recommendations for Field Crops in Michigan”

Do the soil conditions favor a micronutrient deficiency?

Table 2. Crop & soil conditions favoring micronutriient deficiencies
Micronutrient

Soil

Crop

Boron

Sandy Soils (CEC<8)

Alfalfa and Clover

Copper

Acid, organic soils and black sands (pH<5.3

Wheat and Corn

Manganese

Organic soils (pH.5.6) and black sands, lakebed and depressional soils (pH>6.5

Soybeans, Wheat and Corn

Zinc

All soil types (pH>6.5

Corn

Are you applying the right fertilizer source for the application method?
Are you using the best application method for the crop?
Are you applying the fertilizer at the optimum time?
Are you applying the fertilizer at the recommended rate?
Use the following information to find the answers to these questions.

Micronutrient fertilizer application recommendations

Boron:

  • Broadcast 1-2 pounds of actual boron/acre in the topdressed fertilizer in alfalfa
  • Boron applications will inhibit forage grass germination

Manganese:

  • 2 x 2 band placement is best (dry fertilizers)
  • Foliar applications of 1-2 lbs. of actual Mn and 30 gallons of water per acre will correct deficiency symptoms. Manganese sulfate is the preferred choice. Application rates for some liquid products don’t supply enough actual manganese.
  • Manganese soil test levels do not increase. Deficiency symptoms will show up in the same areas whenever soybeans are planted
  • Never broadcast manganese fertilizers

Zinc:

  • Test for zinc whenever soil pH is greater than 7.0 and corn will be grown
  • Base application rates on soil test results
  • 2 x 2 starter band is best
  • Zinc chelates can be applied in a band at 1/5 the rate for inorganic salts
  • Foliar applications of .5 to 1 lb. of actual zinc in 30 gals. of water per acre will correct deficiency symptoms
  • Can be broadcast at 10 lbs. actual zinc per acre

Copper:

  • Most mineral soils in Michigan contain adequate amounts of copper
  • Soil test levels >0.5 ppm are adequate
  • Organic soils are naturally low in copper
  • Don’t grow highly responsive crops on organic soils

Iron:

  • MSU does not recommend iron applications
  • Select soybean varieties that are resistant to iron Chlorosis

 

 Near Seed Fertilizer Placement

Corn growers are interested in placing their fertilizer closer to the seed than the traditional 2 x 2 placement. If you plan to place your starter fertilizer near the seed you should consider the following information.

Fertilizer placed in direct contact with the seed has the potential to reduce germination. This is especially true when planting into dry soil. As a general rule, never apply more than 5 pounds of N plus K2O on soils having CECs of 5 meq/100g or less and no more than 8 pounds of N plus K2O on soils having CECs of 8 meq/100g or more. Ammonium thiosulfate and/or boron should not be applied in direct contact with the seed as they are known to adversely affect germination.

Research conducted by Dr. George Rehm at the University of Minnesota in 2004 compared near seed fertilizer placement options (with seed, double band above seed and single band above seed) for three fertilizers (10-34-0, 4-10-10, 3-18-18) and two application rates (5 and 10 gallons per acre). Soil test levels for P and K were very high at the site. The results are summarized in the following two tables.

Placement and Rate (gallons/acres)

With Seed

Double Band (top)

Single Band (top)

Material

10

5

10

5

10

5

- - - - - - - - bushels per acre- - - - - - - - - -

10-34-0

208.5

199.9

211.7

212.5

218.3

218.0

4-10-10

215.5

211.1

211.6

202.7

220.3

223.4

3-18-18

207.6

202.9

215.9

212.0

220.3

216.1

Yield of control = 213.3 bu./acre

Placement and Rate (gallons/acres)

With Seed

Double Band (top)

Single Band (top)

Material

10

5

10

5

10

5

- - - - - - - - - -% of control- - - - - - - - - -

10-34-0

93.5

97.4

100.7

103.3

102.6

105.9

4-10-10

102.6

103.3

102.6

103.3

102.0

107.2

3-18-18

97.4

107.2

99.4

96.1

103.9

102.6

Control emerged population = 33,320 plants/acre
Preventing Anhydrous Ammonia Theft

Anhydrous ammonia is a key ingredient in the illegal production of methamphetamines. The drug makers have recognized and targeted agricultural nurse tanks as a source of anhydrous ammonia for years. Farmers and agribusinesses should take steps to prevent anhydrous ammonia theft to help curtail the illegal production of methamphetamine and prevent health injuries from accidental releases of anhydrous ammonia. The following ways to prevent anhydrous theft were extracted from Ohio State University Extension Fact Sheet AEX-594.1 “Preventing Theft of Anhydrous Ammonia”.

1. Have tanks delivered as close to the application as possible and return the empty tanks to your supplier immediately after the application

2. Consider using anti-theft locking devices on the nurse tanks

3. Store the tanks in well lighted secure areas whenever possible.

4. Bleed and remove hoses at the end of the day.

5. Check all tanks frequently and look for signs of tampering.

6. Place brightly colored plastic ties between the valve wheel and the roll cage. If the ties are broken, it is likely that someone has tampered with the tank.

7. Do not confront thieves as they can become violent due to the methamphetamine.

8. Call your local law enforcement or drug force personnel for further advice on preventing theft to request nighttime patrols in your area.

 

Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Strategies

Nitrogen fertilizers are expensive and may become unavailable to your crop. Because of this, corn producers will need to manage nitrogen fertilizer carefully to remain profitable in 2005. Listed below are some strategies for getting the most from your investment in nitrogen fertilizer.

Understand what happens to the nitrogen fertilizer you apply.
Studies have shown that only 40 to 60% of the nitrogen you apply is taken up by your crop. Another 20 to 30% remains in the soil after harvest and 10 to 20% becomes unavailable to plants during the growing season. The losses are due to three processes, volatilization, leaching and denitrification. Volatilization occurs when fertilizers containing urea undergo rapid hydrolysis in the soil. Significant losses of ammonia gas can occur. Nitrate-nitrogen is susceptible to losses from leaching and denitrification. Leaching is most likely to take place in coarse-textured soils. Denitrification of nitrate-nitrogen occurs under saturated conditions on fine-textued soils. Over 100 lbs. of nitrogen per acre can be lost from denitrification in five days under the proper conditions.

Select your nitrogen fertilizers and understand their management requirements.
The three main nitrogen fertilizer sources are anhydrous ammonia, urea and urea ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN). Anhydrous ammonia is still the least expensive form of nitrogen. It must be injected 6 to 8 inches deep and the slot must be sealed to prevent losses. If applied properly, it is the most stable nitrogen source as it is the slowest fertilizer to be converted to nitrate. Urea is subject to volatilization losses. Volatilization occurs rapidly under warm air temperatures in fields having low CEC’s, heavy residues and adequate moisture. These losses can be reduced by incorporating the fertilizer with tillage at least 1-3/4 inches deep or by at least 3/4 of an inch of irrigation or rain fall. Urease inhibitors are available to mix with the fertilizer and prevent volatilization for 10 to 14 days following a surface application. The urea will not be available to plants during this time. UAN solutions are comprised of half urea and half ammonium nitrate. Therefore, half of the nitrogen is subject to volatilization losses. About 25% percent of the nitrogen is in the nitrate form at the time of application and is subject to losses from leaching or denitrification.

Identify the most economical nitrogen application rate
The first step is to determine your price per pound of actual nitrogen and the market price you expect to receive for your corn. Determine the corn to nitrogen price ratio from Table 1. Next you will need to set realistic yield goals for your fields. A realistic yield goal is the average yield you attained in the field for the last five production years for that crop. Find the point on table 2 where your yield goal and your corn to nitrogen price ratio intersect. You may have to interpolate between rows and columns. This is the most economical nitrogen rate for this field.

Table 1. Corn: Nitrogen Price Ratio

Corn Price ($/bu)

N cost ($/lb)

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

---corn:N price ratio---

.05

20:1

30:1:

40:1

50:1

60:1

70:1

80:1

.10

10:1

15:1

20:1

25:1

30:1

35:1

40:1

.15

7:1

10:1

13:1

17:1

20:1

23:1

27:1

.20

5:1

8:1

10:1

12:1

15:1

18:1

20:1

.25

4:1

6:1

8:1

10:1

12:1

14:1

16:1

.30

3:1

5:1

7:1

8:1

10:1

12:1

13:1

.35

3:1

4:1

6:1

7:1

9:1

10:1

11:1

.40

2:1

4:1

5:1

6:1

8:1

8:1

10:1

Source: MSU Extension Bulletin E-802

Table 2. The most profitable nitrogen rate (lbs N/acre) at various yield goals and corn to nitrogen price ratios.

Corn:N Price ratio

Yield potential of soil (bu/A)

85

100

115

130

145

160

175

190

- - -most profitable N rate (lb N/A)- - -

5:1

80

90

100

110

130

140

150

170

10:1

90

110

130

140

160

180

190

210

15:1

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

20:1

110

130

150

170

190

210

230

250

25:1

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

Adjust the nitrogen application rate for all possible nitrogen credits.
Corn growers can reduce their nitrogen fertilizer application rates by taking credit for the nitrogen contributions from legumes, manure applications and the soil. The credits should be subtracted from the most economical nitrogen rate determined above. Soybeans will contribute 30 pounds of actual nitrogen to the following corn crop. Established alfalfa and clovers will contribute between 40 and 90 pounds of actual nitrogen depending on the plant population. Manure can be an excellent source of nitrogen. The pre-sidedress nitrate test is a proven method for determining the nitrogen contributions from manured and non-manured fields. Do not take nitrogen credits when growing wheat. Wheat’s peak demand for nitrogen occurs earlier in the growing season before organic nitrogen has been converted to plant available forms.

 Table 3. Economic returns from pre-sidedress nitrate testing

PSNT Credit(lbs./acre)

Cost Savings on Nitrogen ($/acre)

Economic Gain($/acre)

30

8.70

5.70

60

17.40

14.40

90

26.10

23.10

120

34.80

31.80

Source: Dr. Carrie Laboski
Assumptions: Nitrogen cost is $0.29/lb of nitrogen
Sampling and analysis costs are $3/acre

Apply nitrogen fertilizers at the optimum time
Always apply at least 20 pounds of actual nitrogen per acre in a 2 x 2 band at planting time. Increase this amount to 30 to 40 pounds per acre when planting into heavy residues. Ideally, the rest of your nitrogen should be applied in early June as this coincides with the beginning of the crop’s peak demand for nitrogen. By applying most of your nitrogen in June, you will significantly reduce the potential for nitrogen losses due to leaching and denitrification. If you must apply your nitrogen prior to planting, consider using a nitrification inhibitor. These products can delay the conversion of ammonium to nitrate by 4 to 10 weeks. Nitrification inhibitors will work best if the nitrogen fertilizer rate is slightly deficient. Please see table 4 to determine the probability of realizing an economic return from nitrification inhibitors.

Table 4. Probabilities of realizing an economic return from nitrification inhibitors

                           - - -Time of Nitrogen Application- - -

Soil Management Group Early Spring<50 F Late Spring>50 F Side Dress
Clays (0, 1) Good-Fair Poor-Fair Poor
Clay loams (1.5) Fair-Good Poor-Fair Poor
Loams (2.5) Fair Fair Poor
Sandy Loams (3) Fair Fair Poor
Loamy Sand (4) Fair Fair Poor
Sands (5) Fair-Poor Fair Poor
Key:
Good=Economic response expected at least 60% of the time
Fair=Economic response expected 40-50% of the time.
Poor=Economic response expected less than 30% of the time.
Source: Nutrient Management to Protect Water Quality Bulletin WQ-25, 01/1996

 fertilizersprayer.gif (50398 bytes)

Soybean Rust Monitoring (Sentinel Plots)

One of the best ways to determine when soybean rust has first arrived in a soybean production area is to set up monitoring or sentinel plots. Ideally, this should be a field that was planted significantly earlier than other fields in a growing area. All growers that plan to plant some soybeans early (during the last week of April or earlier) should contact their local MSU Extension office so that we can arrange to have the earliest planted fields closely monitored.

Field Crop Hotline

The Berrien County field crops hot line will be activated on April, 11, 2005. This recorded message will be updated each week with timely crop and pest management information. You can access the hotline by calling (269) 944-4126 ext.. 4004. We are also available to help you solve any crop production/management problems you might encounter this season.

 Tracking Soybean Rust Toward Michigan

One of the advantages of being in the northern part of the United States is that we have a built-in detection and monitoring system for diseases and insects that are brought up from southern weather patterns. As conditions become favorable for movement of pests from the deep south, we receive reports from in-between states of their advancement of soybean rust.

USDA offers an internet website that you can use to follow the development of soybean rust as its advancement is mapped with updated commentaries. This site can be located at http://www.sbrusa.net and will give you daily updates of areas that have been scouted and the general location of confirmed sites. As of March 29th two sites were confirmed in west central Florida. Additional, scouting has taken place in southern Texas with no confirmed rust. As the season progresses, more and more states will be reporting to this site. This is part of a nation-wide scouting program to help growers keep abreast of soybean rust development.

Additional Soybean Rust Website Information

North American Plant Disease Forecast Center http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/pp/soybeanrust

Timely updates of soybean rust detection in southern states with “current forecasts” that include regional weather, trajectory weather (likely path of spore movement) and current threat level (high, medium, low).

USDA – Soybean rust Information Site http://www.usda.gov/soybeanrust

A one stop resource where you can get the latest on surveillance, reporting, predictions (including maps) and management of soybean rust for the 2005 growing season. Includes federal, state, university and industry-coordinated efforts.

The Southern Plant diagnostic Network http://spdn.ifas.ufl.edu/soybean_rust.htm

An excellent source for the latest information on soybean rust from the southern states. Includes links to soybean rust information pages for all the major land grant universities in 12 southern states, with additional links to mapping, forecasting and many others. Good photo gallery at South Carolina.

Improving Tractor Performance and Fuel Efficiency

Achieving the maximum tractor performance requires careful attention to tire pressure and ballast. Inflating radial tires to the proper pressure has been shown to reduce wheel slip. Since the wheels slip less, the tractor and implement will cover more ground saving time for the operator. Reducing wheel slip also results in fuel savings of up to 10%. Other benefits of proper tire inflation include increased tire life, improved ride and reduced soil compaction. To determine the proper inflation pressure, you will need to know the weight for each axle on your tractor. Before you can determine the weight of each axle, you will need to make sure that the weight is properly distributed between the front and rear axles as this determines the ideal balance between traction and wheel slip. Use Table 1 below to determine the proper weight distribution and refer to Table 2 to find the proper inflation pressure.

Table 1. Front and Rear Weight Distribution

Tractor Design/Implement Type

Front

Rear

Two-wheel drive/Trailing implement

25%

75%

Two-wheel drive/Semi mounted implement

30%

70%

Two wheel drive /Mounted implement

35%

65%

Front-wheel assist/Trailing implement

40%

60%

Front-wheel assist/Mounted implement

45%

55%

Four-wheel drive/Trailing implement

55%

45%

Four-wheel drive/Mounted implement

60%

40%

(Table taken from G-1235, Tractor Tire & Ballast Management, University of Missouri-Columbia)

Table 2. Load and Inflation Tables for Selected Radial Drive Tires for Speeds up to 25 MPH.

Tire Size Designation

Load (lbs.)

6 psi

8 psi

10 psi

12 psi

14 psi

18 psi

24 psi

Single

4200

4580

5360

18.4R34

Double

2460

2900

3310

3700

4030

4720

Single

4440

4860

5680

6600

18.4R38

Double

2600

3080

3500

3910

4280

5000

5810

Single

4680

5120

6000

6950

18.4R42

Double

2750

3260

3700

4120

4510

5280

6120

Single

4920

5400

6150

7400

18.4R46

Double

2890

3410

3890

4330

4750

5410

6510

Single

5080

5560

6400

20.8R34

Double

2970

3520

4010

4470

4890

5630

Single

5380

5880

6800

8050

20.8R38

Double

3150

3730

4260

4730

5170

5980

7080

Single

5680

6200

7150

8550

20.8R42

Double

3330

3940

4490

5000

5460

6290

7520

Single

7590

8550

9650

11700

710/70R38

Double

4720

5380

6110

6670

7520

8490

10300

(Table taken from AEX-530-94, Let The Air Out! Advantages of Property Adjusted Radial Tire Pressure, Ohio State University Extension)

Considerations for the Day of Planting
R.L. Nielsen, Agronomy Dept., Purdue University

Corn and soybean planting are just around the proverbial corner. Regardless of planting date, certain crop management decisions need to be made on the day of planting on a field-by-field basis. cornstalks305.gif (41364 bytes)

A number of these decisions are related to planter adjustments and operation. Other day-of-planting decisions relate to seeding depth, seeding rate, and hybrid planting order. Factors that impact these decisions include soil moisture & temperature conditions, surface soil conditions, short-term weather forecasts, and variability among your available seed lots for hybrid vigor, seed quality and seed size.

Planter Decisions. For pneumatic planter metering systems, you should prepare a checklist for every seed lot you have in the shed prior to planting that includes each seed lot’s seed weight (seeds per lb), the appropriate air or vacuum pressure, and the appropriate seed disc or drum. The latter two items require that you find the planter operations manual that has been collecting dust since last year. Keep this checklist with you during planting and refer to it when you change hybrids to ensure that you adjust the planter accordingly and avoid variable seed spacing.

Adjustments to the down pressure of the furrow closing devices (wheels, fingers, etc.) should be made according to the soil conditions of every field you plant, and may vary day by day during the season. Use only enough down pressure to firmly close the seed furrow. Excessive down pressure can compact the soil above the seed and restrict the emergence of the corn seedlings. Obviously, inadequate down pressure may leave open furrows, especially in no-till systems.

Adjust the depth and tension of no-till coulters to match soil conditions. Do not cut deeper with the coulter (in line with the disc opener) than the depth of seeding. Excessively deep coulter action can disturb too much soil below where the seed lands, making it difficult for the closing wheels to adequately firm the soil around the seed.

Remember that excessive down pressure at the parallel linkages (i.e., heavy-duty no-till springs) can lift the planter frame AND

the drive wheels, resulting in uneven operation of the planter transmission and subsequent uneven seed spacing or seeding population. Ensure that the planter units are parallel or level to the ground when the planter is in operation to avoid problems with disc opener depth, press wheel efficiency, and seed to soil contact.

Planting speed should not exceed the manufacturer’s recommendations because of the risk of uneven seed spacing. For most planters, the optimum range of speeds is 5 to 6 miles per hour. If you’re hell-bent on planting faster than this, at least do yourself a favor and check seeds in the row once in a while for accuracy in spacing and depth.

Remember to faithfully use graphite lubricant with finger-pickup seed meters at a rate of 1 tablespoon per bushel of seed. If you discover excessive seed treatment is building up on the fingers or meter backplate, then use more graphite. Remember to faithfully use talc powder with vacuum seed meters at a rate of 1 cup per bushel to prevent sticky seed, especially under humid conditions.

Diligently lubricate the chains and bearings of the planter every day. This is best done at the end of a planting day when the chains and bearings are warm. Use a multi-purpose spray lubricant on the planter chains, not chain lube or old motor oil, because such lubricant dries better, is less sticky, and is less of a dirt magnet the following day.

Crop Management Decisions. Choose an appropriate seeding depth according to the field conditions & weather forecast. The primary goal is to aim for a depth that will ensure placement of seed into uniform soil moisture. Spatial variability for moisture in the seed zone is probably the most common cause of uneven germination and emergence of corn. As a rule of thumb, I recommend seeding depths no less than 1 ½ inches. If necessary, do not hesitate to plant as deeply as 2 or 3 inches if that is what it takes to reach adequate and uniform soil moisture. Check the actual depth of seeding frequently from field to field or day to day. Actual seeding depth can vary from the targeted planter setting as soil conditions change.

Remember that rapid and uniform corn germination and emergence will not occur when soil temperatures are less than 50o F. Seedling establishment will also not occur rapidly and uniformly if soil temperatures remain cold. Cool soils are especially likely when planting early and/or in no-till with heavy surface trash.

For these reasons, improve the odds of successful stand establishment when planting early in the season by strategically planting the various hybrids at your disposal. Early in the planting season, plant hybrids with excellent seedling vigor ratings and warm germination ratings. Save the hybrids with merely average seedling vigor ratings and warm germination ratings for later in the season when soils have warmed significantly. If you have access to cold germination ratings for your hybrids, similarly begin planting with the best cold germination seed lots and end with the average lots.

Avoid planting early with seed lots whose seed size is excessively or unusually small (e.g., 35 lb 80k bags). Most of the time, seed size is of no consequence in performance of a given seed lot. However, evidence from research in Wisconsin years ago suggests that such unusually small seed can be at a disadvantage when germination/emergence and early stand establishment conditions are severely limited by cold soils.

Generally, most Indiana corn growers should aim for final plant populations at harvest in the range of 26- to 30,000 plants per acre. Under ‘normal’ planting conditions, this target requires seeding rates between 28- and 33,000 seeds per acre to account for normal rates of germination failure and seedling mortality. Early in the season, consider using seeding rates that are 5 to 10% greater than what you would normally use if you expect greater than normal mortality rates due to cold and ‘crappy’ conditions with early planting.

The use of starter fertilizer is especially helpful when planting early into cold and ‘crappy’ conditions. Purdue research suggests that starter nitrogen (N) is the primary nutrient of interest where soil phosphorus and potassium levels are adequate for crop growth. Aim for no less than 20 lbs of actual N per acre to maximize the probability and magnitude of a yield response to starter fertilizer. This rate would be equal to 6.5 gallons of 28% UAN per acre or 200 lbs of 10-34-0 per acre applied in a traditional 2 x 2 placement with the planter. Such rates obviously restrict the use of starter placement with the seed because of the risk of fertilizer salt injury to the seed or seedling.

 Hybrid Maturity Selection to Maximize Profits in 2005

The cost of drying corn may increase next fall due to increases in natural gas and propane prices. The worst case scenario would be to have poor field drying conditions combined with high fuel prices. You can’t control the weather but you can buy your propane in June at the seasonal low price and plant earlier maturing hybrids that yield well. The following table will help you decide when to switch to earlier maturing hybrids should you experience significant planting delays. These recommendations will yield the greatest net income per acre in most growing seasons.

Corn Hybrid Maturity Recommendations
for Berrien, Cass and Van Buren Counties.

Planting Date

Hybrid Maturity(Relative Maturity)

May 1

<112 days

May 10

<108 days

May 20

<103 days

June 1

< 98 days

 

The information given herein is supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by MSU Extension is implied.

 

 

Home Search Feedback

Last modified: April 21, 2005