Michigan State University Extension
Home-Based Business - 09159407
10/01/98

Working at Home


It has been more than a decade since American workers,      
helped by advances in computers and telecommunications,     
began going downstairs instead of downtown.  There were     
about 6.6 million "TELECOMMUTERS" -- employers of           
businesses and government agencies working part or full     
time at home instead of the office -- nationwide in 1992,   
up 20 percent from 1991, according to Link                  
Resources, a New York market research firm.  Although       
they are growing in numbers faster than any other kind of   
home worker, TELECOMMUTERS represent only about a sixth     
of the 39 million Americans who worked at home r.           
Among the rest, 11.7 million were part-time self-           
employed, 12.1 million ran a business full time from home   
and 8.6 million took work home from the office after-       
hours.                                                      

The number of TELECOMMUTERS is expected to rise sharply.    
From the employer's standpoint, working from home has       
proved a winner.  The 10 supervisors interviewed for the    
article all reported either an increase in the employee's   
productivity or no change; none saw a decrease.  Recent     
studies in government and business also found higher        
productivity.  The gains were attributed primarily to       
fewer interruptions by co-workers, meaning better           
concentration on the task at hand.                          

Employers also said an offer to work at home allowed them   
to retain and recruit valuable employees, and sometimes     
to make double use of desks at headquarters, meaning        
lower overhead for office space.  On the other hand, an     
employee's absence from the office can mean delays in       
urgent work and meetings.  The arrangements, however, can   
be a fiasco if the employee has children who are            
unattended, or if the employee does not have the            
discipline to work without continuous supervision.          

From the employees' standpoint, telecommunications has      
proved to be a mixed blessing, but not one they would       
relinquish.  TELECOMMUTERS say they miss the social         
contact and feel compelled to work at all hours because     
the office is right there; a sense that they are captives   
to the job even in the home.  Some telecommuters            
expressed fear that their absence from the office might     
lead co-workers to think they are goofing off and bosses    
to forget them for promotions.                              

Telecommuters pointed to the many benefits.  Those with     
children mentioned the value of spending more time with     
them.  Those who had endured long commutes talked about     
saving time and were also pleased with saving money they    
would have spent on transportation, business clothes and    
meals.                                                      

Advances in technology are making remote offices not only   
possible but appealing.  Personal computers, FAX            
machines, and cellular phones have grown more powerful      
and cheaper; new hardware and software connect home PC's    
and office networks allowing for a "virtual office"         
almost anywhere.                                            

Telecommuting will also be propelled by environmental       
demands over the next decade.  The Federal Clean Air Act    
amendments of 1990 mandate that businesses with 100 or      
more employees in urban areas deemed to have certain air-   
quality problems reduce the use of cars by employees.       
Some companies in New Jersey, Connecticut and Texas are     
expected to begin implementing their plans next year,       
with those in eight other states, including New York,       
Pennsylvania and California, expected to comply by 1996.    

Another trend points to increased reliance on               
telecommuters; the use of part-time and contract workers,   
many of them not covered by benefit plans, as companies     
shrink their "core" work forces to cut costs.               

Most telecommuters, about 5.1 million, were white-collar    
workers.  More men (3.5 million) than women (3.1 million)   
telecommuted last year.  Small businesses lead in the       
adoption of Telecommuting because they are less             
procedure-bound than bigger companies, but bigger           
companies are discovering Telecommuting as an outgrowth     
of streamlining.                                            

Experts say that Telecommuting should not be used as a      
form of day care.  "This is not a good child-care           
solution" said Gal Gorgon, president of Gil Gordon          
Associates, a Monmouth Junction, N.J., telecommuting        
consulting firm and publisher of Telecommuting Review.      
"It takes a fair amount of work to make telecommuting       
successful."                                                

According to Mr. Gordon, telecommuting works best when      
limited to one to three days a week to continue to give     
the telecommuter opportunities for interaction or to do     
things that can only be done in the office.  Many           
telecommuters said it's better not to work at home on       
Monday or Friday, to quell resentment among co-workers      
who might suspect their work-at-home colleagues are         
taking long weekends.                                       

Among the big business that have embraced telecommuting     
are Bankers Trust, American Express Travel Related          
Services, The Travelers Companies, Sears Roebuck and        
Tele-Communications, Inc.                                   

Telecommuters tell why                                      

Four telecommuters were interviewed for the article.        
Some of the reasons they give for telecommuting include:    

- Conforming schedule to meet children's demands, being     
home with the children.                                     

- Avoiding the long commute to work, ranging from 1 to 2    
hours each way.                                             

- Fewer interruptions, less stress and more satisfaction    
with life.                                                  

- The freedom to wander into the kitchen for a cup of       
coffee or to run a load of laundry while waiting for        
calls.                                                      

- The ability to concentrate better at home.                

Source:  "Working at Home, for Better or Worse", The New    
York Times, April 18, 1993.                                 


Go To Top of File        MSU Extension Home Page        Main Page for this Data Base

This information is for educational purposes only. References to commercial products or trade names does not imply endorsement by MSU Extension or bias against those not mentioned. This information becomes public property upon publication and may be printed verbatim with credit to MSU Extension. Reprinting cannot be used to endorse or advertise a commercial product or company. This file was generated from data base I2 on 10/01/98. Data base I2 was last revised on 10/01/98. For more information about this data base or its contents please contact witter@msue.msu.edu . Please read our disclaimer for important information about using our site.