Site Specific Management of Boron in Alfalfa fields

Richard Leep, Peter Jeranyama, Tim Dietz, and James DeYoung

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences

Michigan State University

A study was initiated to evaluate the feasibility of site specific boron application to established alfalfa.  Three dairy farms in Michigan were selected for the study.  The fields were located at the Kellogg Biological Station Dairy farm in Kalamazoo County, the Ken Gasper dairy farm in Ionia County, and the Larry Gingrich dairy farm in Osceola County, Michigan.  Each field of alfalfa was established in 1998.  Soils were tested in the spring of 2000 to determine boron content and applications were made on the basis of boron levels and soil type.  Plots were divided into either site specific applications which were based upon site specific soil tests or whole field management applications based upon the field composite soil test. 

At KBS site specific management of boron was associated with a higher yield response compared with whole field management. Also without boron application in both site specific and whole field management did not result in similar yields to those of boron application (Table 1). All cuttings but the third cutting did not respond to boron management. In this case site specific management at KBS 1 was associated with a higher yield compared with whole field management in the third cutting (Table 2).

At Osceola 1 (established alfalfa), there were no significant differences between whole field and site specific management (Table 3). However, site specific management in either without boron or with boron treatments had significantly higher yields than whole field management (Table 3). Total seasonal yields were higher within site specific management of boron but, individual cuttings were not different from each other (Table 3).

At the Ionia alfalfa field (established alfalfa), site specific management of boron produced significantly higher yields compared with whole field management in the first cutting (Table 4).However, in the second cutting, whole field management had significantly higher yields compared with site specific management. Total season yields were not different among management and boron treatments (Table 4). In the second cutting, whole field management was associated with higher neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations (Table 5). Also,  in the second cutting within whole field management  boron application was associated with a higher NDF concentration compared with without boron treatment (Table 5). In both site specific and whole field management, without boron treatment was associated with a higher crude protein (CP) concentration (Table 5).

In summary, site specific boron application based upon grid sampling fields, shows potential for yield enhancement in established alfalfa in the fields under study. 

Table 1. Yield  response to management and Boron applications at KBS1 in small plots.

 

Management

 

without Boron

 

with Boron

 

LSD 5%

 

 

 

                   ----------------t/A------------

 

 

 

Whole Field

 

4.98

 

5.08

 

NS

 

Site Specific

 

4.96

 

5.17

 

0.08

 

LSD 5%

 

NS

 

0.08

 

 

 

Table 2. The effect of management and cut on alfalfa yield at KBS1 in small plots.

 

Cut

 

Whole Field Management

 

Site Specific Management

 

LSD 5%

 

 

 

                    ------------- t/A--------------

 

 

 

1

 

1.15

 

1.16

 

NS

 

2

 

1.23

 

1.27

 

NS

 

3

 

1.16

 

1.30

 

0.12

 

4

 

1.44

 

1.34

 

NS

 

All

 

4.98

 

5.07

 

NS

 

LSD 5%

 

0.10

 

NS

 

 

 

Table 3. Yield  response to management and Boron applications at Osceola 1 in small plots.

 

Management

 

without Boron

 

with Boron

 

LSD 5%

 

 

 

                     --------------------t/A----------------

 

 

 

Whole Field

 

2.98

 

3.03

 

NS

 

Site Specific

 

3.22

 

3.30

 

NS

 

LSD 5%

 

0.25

 

0.26

 

 


Table 4. The effect of Boron application and cut on alfalfa yield at Osceola small plots.

 

Cut

 

Without Boron

 

With Boron

 

LSD 5%

 

 

 

                ---------------- t/A--------------

 

 

 

1

 

1.10

 

1.22

 

NS

 

2

 

0.85

 

0.91

 

NS

 

3

 

1.08

 

1.17

 

NS

 

All

 

3.03

 

3.30

 

0.25

 

LSD 5%

 

NS

 

NS

 

 


Table 5. Effects of management and Boron application on yield at Ionia in small plots.

 

 

 

Cut 1

 

LSD

 

cut 2

 

LSD

 

Total Yield

 

LSD

 

Management

 

No Boron

 

With Boron

 

 

 

No Boron

 

With Boron

 

 

 

No Boron

 

With Boron

 

 

 

 

 

    ----------------------------------------t / A--------------------------------

 

Whole Field

 

1.99

 

1.12

 

0.71

 

1.16

 

2.10

 

0.63

 

4.52

 

4.37

 

NS

 

Site Specific

 

1.98

 

1.35

 

0.52

 

1.14

 

1.63

 

0.45

 

4.46

 

4.37

 

NS

 

LSD 5%

 

NS

 

0.17

 

 

 

NS

 

0.19

 

 

 

NS

 

NS

 

 

 

Table 6. Effects of management and Boron application on ADF, NDF and CP concentrations at Ionia in small plots.

 

 

 

ADF2

 

LSD

 

NDF 2

 

LSD

 

CP2

 

LSD

 

Management

 

No Boron

 

With Boron

 

 

 

No Boron

 

With Boron

 

 

 

No Boron

 

With Boron

 

 

 

 

 

   -------------------------------------%----------------------------------------

 

Whole Field

 

35.5

 

37.6

 

NS

 

45.6

 

49.0

 

3.2

 

24.3

 

22.8

 

NS

 

Site Specific

 

36.7

 

36.2

 

NS

 

49.1

 

47.6

 

NS

 

24.2

 

22.6

 

0.8

 

LSD 5%

 

NS

 

NS

 

 

 

NS

 

1.0

 

 

 

NS

 

NS

 

 

 

Table 4. The effect of Boron application and cut on alfalfa yield at Osceola small plots.

 

Cut