Site
Specific Management of Boron in Alfalfa fields
Richard
Leep, Peter Jeranyama, Tim Dietz, and James DeYoung
Department
of Crop and Soil Sciences
Michigan
State University
A
study was initiated to evaluate the feasibility of site specific
boron application to established alfalfa. Three dairy farms in Michigan were selected for the study. The fields were located at the Kellogg Biological
Station Dairy farm in Kalamazoo County, the Ken Gasper dairy farm
in Ionia County, and the Larry Gingrich dairy farm in Osceola
County, Michigan. Each
field of alfalfa was established in 1998.
Soils were tested in the spring of 2000 to determine boron
content and applications were made on the basis of boron levels
and soil type. Plots were
divided into either site specific applications which were based
upon site specific soil tests or whole field management applications
based upon the field composite soil test.
At
KBS site specific management of boron was associated with a higher
yield response compared with whole field management. Also without
boron application in both site specific and whole field management
did not result in similar yields to those of boron application
(Table 1). All cuttings but the third cutting did not respond
to boron management. In this case site specific management at
KBS 1 was associated with a higher yield compared with whole field
management in the third cutting (Table 2).
At
Osceola 1 (established alfalfa), there were no significant differences
between whole field and site specific management (Table 3). However,
site specific management in either without boron or with boron
treatments had significantly higher yields than whole field management
(Table 3). Total seasonal yields were higher within site specific
management of boron but, individual cuttings were not different
from each other (Table 3).
At
the Ionia alfalfa field (established alfalfa), site specific management
of boron produced significantly higher yields compared with whole
field management in the first cutting (Table 4).However, in the
second cutting, whole field management had significantly higher
yields compared with site specific management. Total season yields
were not different among management and boron treatments (Table
4). In the second cutting, whole field management was associated
with higher neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentrations (Table
5). Also, in the second
cutting within whole field management
boron application was associated with a higher NDF concentration
compared with without boron treatment (Table 5). In both site
specific and whole field management, without boron treatment was
associated with a higher crude protein (CP) concentration (Table
5).
In
summary, site specific boron application based upon grid sampling
fields, shows potential for yield enhancement in established alfalfa
in the fields under study.
Table 1. Yield response to management and Boron applications
at KBS1 in small plots.
|
Management
|
without Boron
|
with Boron
|
LSD 5%
|
|
|
----------------t/A------------
|
|
|
Whole
Field
|
4.98
|
5.08
|
NS
|
|
Site
Specific
|
4.96
|
5.17
|
0.08
|
|
LSD
5%
|
NS
|
0.08
|
|
Table
2. The effect of management and cut on alfalfa yield at KBS1
in small plots.
|
Cut
|
Whole Field Management
|
Site Specific Management
|
LSD 5%
|
|
|
------------- t/A--------------
|
|
|
1
|
1.15
|
1.16
|
NS
|
|
2
|
1.23
|
1.27
|
NS
|
|
3
|
1.16
|
1.30
|
0.12
|
|
4
|
1.44
|
1.34
|
NS
|
|
All
|
4.98
|
5.07
|
NS
|
|
LSD 5%
|
0.10
|
NS
|
|
Table 3. Yield response to management and Boron applications
at Osceola 1 in small plots.
|
Management
|
without Boron
|
with Boron
|
LSD 5%
|
|
|
--------------------t/A----------------
|
|
|
Whole
Field
|
2.98
|
3.03
|
NS
|
|
Site
Specific
|
3.22
|
3.30
|
NS
|
|
LSD
5%
|
0.25
|
0.26
|
|
Table 4. The
effect of Boron application and cut on alfalfa yield at Osceola
small plots.
|
Cut
|
Without Boron
|
With Boron
|
LSD 5%
|
|
|
---------------- t/A--------------
|
|
|
1
|
1.10
|
1.22
|
NS
|
|
2
|
0.85
|
0.91
|
NS
|
|
3
|
1.08
|
1.17
|
NS
|
|
All
|
3.03
|
3.30
|
0.25
|
|
LSD 5%
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
Table 5. Effects
of management and Boron application on yield at Ionia in small
plots.
|
|
Cut 1
|
LSD
|
cut 2
|
LSD
|
Total Yield
|
LSD
|
|
Management
|
No Boron
|
With Boron
|
|
No Boron
|
With Boron
|
|
No Boron
|
With Boron
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------t
/ A--------------------------------
|
|
Whole
Field
|
1.99
|
1.12
|
0.71
|
1.16
|
2.10
|
0.63
|
4.52
|
4.37
|
NS
|
|
Site
Specific
|
1.98
|
1.35
|
0.52
|
1.14
|
1.63
|
0.45
|
4.46
|
4.37
|
NS
|
|
LSD
5%
|
NS
|
0.17
|
|
NS
|
0.19
|
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
Table 6. Effects
of management and Boron application on ADF, NDF and CP concentrations
at Ionia in small plots.
|
|
ADF2
|
LSD
|
NDF 2
|
LSD
|
CP2
|
LSD
|
|
Management
|
No Boron
|
With Boron
|
|
No Boron
|
With Boron
|
|
No Boron
|
With Boron
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------%----------------------------------------
|
|
Whole
Field
|
35.5
|
37.6
|
NS
|
45.6
|
49.0
|
3.2
|
24.3
|
22.8
|
NS
|
|
Site
Specific
|
36.7
|
36.2
|
NS
|
49.1
|
47.6
|
NS
|
24.2
|
22.6
|
0.8
|
|
LSD
5%
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
NS
|
1.0
|
|
NS
|
NS
|
|
Table
4. The effect of Boron application and cut on alfalfa yield
at Osceola small plots.